Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Law, Language, and Power: English and the Production of Ignorance in International Law


In this article I examine the unintentional production of ignorance following from the hegemony of the English language in international law scholarship and its impact on legal outcomes. In doing so, I am influenced by critical discourse analysis (CDA), specifically following Fairclough and Van Dijk and their focus on the relationship between language and power – specifically their focus on how language contributes to the domination of some people over others. In developing this I start with arguing that the dominance of English in the expert discourse in international law means that priority is given to certain narratives (e.g., the canon of Western philosophy) and epistemologies (of ignorance) over others. This is because the use of English appears to be symptomatic of the dominance of Western (Euro-American) legalism, and the use of English may reinforce this dominance. Illustrating these points, I use the dissenting opinion of Judge Weeramantry in the Nuclear Weapons case before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and international criminal law. I conclude with some reflections on law and language more generally and propose themes for further research and offer practical suggestions for a more pluralistic knowledge production in international law.

Cite as: Lentner, JLL 8 (2019): 50–66, DOI: 10.14762/jll.2019.050

صندلی اداری سرور مجازی ایران Decentralized Exchange


power, international law, critical discourse studies, experts, narrative, argumentation



  1. Alcoff, Linda M. (2007). Epistemology of Ignorance: Three Types. In S. Sullivan & N. Tuana (Eds.), Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance: Three Types (39–57). State University of New York Press.
  2. Bandyopadhyay, Pramathanath (1920). International Law and Custom in Ancient India. Calcutta UP.
  3. Bianchi, Andrea, Peat, Daniel & Windsor, Matthew (Eds.) (2015). Interpretation in International Law. Oxford UP. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198725749.001.0001
  4. Bohlander, Michael (2014). Language, Culture, Legal Traditions, and International Criminal Justice. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 12, 491–513. DOI: 10.1093/jicj/mqu034
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre (1987). The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field. Hastings Law Journal, 38, 805–853.
  6. Cass, Deborah Z. (1996). Navigating the Newstream: Recent Critical Scholarship in International Law. Nordic Journal of International Law, 65, 341–383.
  7. Cover, Robert M. (1983). The Supreme Court, 1982 Term—Foreword: Nomos and Narrative. Harvard Law Review, 97, 4–68.
  8. Darian-Smith, Eve (2013). Laws and societies in global contexts: Contemporary approaches. Cambridge UP.
  9. d’Aspremont, Jean (2012). Wording in International Law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 25(3), 575–602. DOI: 10.1017/S0922156512000283
  10. d’Aspremont, Jean (2016). Epistemic Forces in International Law: Foundational Doctrines and Techniques of International Legal Argumentation. Elgar international law. Edward Elgar.
  11. d’Aspremont, Jean (2020). International Legal Methods: Working for a Tragic and Cynical Routine. Forthcoming in Rossana Deplano & Nicholas Tsagourias (Eds.), Handbook on Research Methods in International Law. Edward Elgar.
  12. d’Aspremont, Jean & van den Herik, Larissa (2013). The Digitalization of the Assembly Line of Knowledge About Law: A Reinvention of the Confrontational Nature of Legal Scholarship? Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper (54), 1–15.
  13. Dolzer, Rudolf & Schreuer, Christoph (2012). Principles of International Investment Law (2nd ed.). Oxford UP.
  14. Fairclough, Norman (1989). Language and power. Longman.
  15. Fischer-Lescano, Andreas & Teubner, Gunther (2004). Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law, 25(4), 999–1046.
  16. Fish, Stanley (1980). Is there a text in this class? Harvard UP.
  17. Focarelli, Carlo (2012). International law as social construct: The struggle for global justice. Oxford UP.
  18. Ginsburg, Tom & Stephanopoulos, Nicholas (2017). The Concepts of Law. University of Chicago Law Review, 84, 147–175.
  19. Green, L.C. (1998). Cicero and Clausewitz or Quincy Wright: The Interplay of Law and War. USAFA Journal of Legal Studies, 9, 59–98.
  20. Green, Leslie C. (1996). Enforcement of the Law in International and Non-International Conflicts – The Way Ahead. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 24(2–3), 285–320.
  21. Grosse Ruse-Khan, Henning (2016). Protection of Intellectual Property in International Law. Oxford UP.
  22. Guillermand, Jean (1994). The Historical Foundations of Humanitarian Action. International Committee of the Red Cross.
  23. Heathcote, Gina (2019). Feminist Dialogues on International Law. Oxford UP.
  24. Hodson, Loveday & Lavers, Troy (Eds.) (2019). Feminist judgments in international law. Hart.
  25. Hurd, Ian (2017). How to do things with international law. Princeton UP.
  26. Immerwahr, Daniel (2019). How to hide an empire: A short history of the greater United States. Penguin Random House.
  27. Kapur, Ratna (2014). Sexual subalterns, human rights and the limits of the liberal imaginary, available at
  28. Kennedy, David (1980). Theses about International Law Discourse. German Yearbook of International Law, 353–390.
  29. Kennedy, David (1997). Book Review: The Right of Conquest by Sharon Korman. American Journal of International Law, 91(4), 745–748.
  30. Kennedy, David (2016). A World of Struggle. Oxford UP.
  31. Koskenniemi, Martti (2005). From apology to Utopia: The structure of international legal argument : reissue with a new epilogue. Cambridge UP.
  32. Koskenniemi, Martti (2009). The Politics of International Law – 20 Years Later. European Journal of International Law, 20(1), 7–19. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chp006
  33. Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (1989). Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the conditions of practical and legal reasoning in international relations and domestic affairs. Cambridge UP. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511491429.013
  34. Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard UP.
  35. Lentner, Gabriel M. (2018a). Nomos and Narrative: The Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in International Investment Law. TTLF Working Paper No 34.
  36. Lentner, Gabriel M. (2018b). The UN Security Council and the International Criminal Court: The Referral Mechanism in Theory and Practice. Edward Elgar.
  37. Lentner, Gabriel M. (2018c). Treating Data as Property? A View from International Investment Arbitration. Medien und Recht International, 71–72.
  38. Mertz, Elizabeth E. & Rajah, Jothie (2014). Language-and-Law Scholarship: An Interdisciplinary Conversation and a Post-9/11 Example. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10(1), 169–183. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-133958
  39. Mitterer, Josef (2011). Das Jenseits der Philosophie: Wider das dualistische Erkenntnisprinzip. Velbrück Wissenschaft.
  40. Nelken, David (2004). Using the Concept of Legal Culture. UC Berkeley Papers Presented in the Center for the Study of Law and Society Bag Lunch Speaker Series, 1–27.
  41. Newton, Michael A. (2018). Reframing the Proportionality Principle. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 51, 867–885.
  42. Phillipson, Robert (2008). The Linguistic Imperialism of Neoliberal Empire. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 5(1), 1–43. DOI: 10.1080/15427580701696886
  43. Rajah, Jothie (2015). ‘Rule of Law’ as Transnational Legal Order. In T. C. Halliday & G. Shaffer (Eds.), Transnational Legal Orders (pp. 340–373). Cambridge UP.
  44. Roberts, Anthea (2013). Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies shaping the Investment Treaty System. American Journal of International Law, 107, 45–94.
  45. Roberts, Anthea (2017). Is International Law International? Oxford UP.
  46. Roberts, Anthea, Stephan, Paul B., Verdier, Pierre-Hugues & Versteeg, Mila (Eds.) (2018). Comparative International Law. Oxford UP.
  47. Rosen, Lawrence (2006). Law as Culture: An Invitation. Princeton UP.
  48. Shklar, Judith N. (1986). Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Harvard UP.
  49. Somek, Alexander (2006). Rechtliches Wissen. Suhrkamp.
  50. Subedi, Surya P. (2003). The Concept in Hinduism of ′Just War′. J Conflict Security Law, 8(2) 339–361.
  51. Suntrup, Jan C. (2017). Michel Foucault and the Competing Alethurgies of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 37(2), 301–325. DOI: 10.1093/ojls/gqw019
  52. Tallgren, Immi (2014). Who are ‘we’ in international criminal law? On critics and membership. In Schwöbel, Christine E. J. (Ed.), Critical approaches to international criminal law: An introduction (71–95).
  53. Tamanaha, Brian Z. (2017). A realistic theory of law. Cambridge UP.
  54. Thornborrow, Joanna (2012). Narrative Analysis. In J. P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), Routledge handbooks in applied linguistics. The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Routledge.
  55. Tomuschat, Christian (2017). The (Hegemonic?) Role of the English Language. Nordic Journal of International Law, 86, 196–227.
  56. Venzke, Ingo (2012). How interpretation makes international law: On semantic change and normative twists. Oxford UP.
  57. Venzke, Ingo (2014). What Makes for a Valid Legal Argument? Leiden Journal of International Law, 27(4), 811–816. DOI: 10.1017/S0922156514000363
  58. Wohlrapp, Harald (2008). Der Begriff des Arguments: Über die Beziehungen zwischen Wissen, Forschen, Glauben, Subjektivität und Vernunft. Königshausen & Neumann.
  59. Yves, Sandoz (1998). The International Committee of the Red Cross as guardian of international humanitarian law. International Committee of the Red Cross.
فروشگاه اینترنتی صندلی اداری