This article studies the use of discourses of legality and legitimacy in order to justify separation amongst Anglophone secessionists in Cameroon. It was motivated by the belief that the study of self-determination can be analyzed by bringing together legal, historical as well as linguistic perspectives. Building on previous works dealing with national identity construction, this article focuses on the linguistic strategies used by independence activists from the former British Trust-territory of Southern Cameroons to justify their fight for independence. The analysis of thirteen (13) speeches given by prominent Southern Cameroonian nationalists was guided by Wodak et al.’s Discourse-Historical Approach and led to the identification of three (3) semantic macrostructures. The latter were found to be enforced in discourse by strategies such as nomination and predication, as well as common place arguments, which in turn are achieved through word choice, intertextuality, storytelling and comparison.
Discourse, Nationalism, Identity, Southern Cameroons, Discourse-historical approach
Raymond Echitchi holds a PhD in English Linguistics from the Complutense University of Madrid and is currently holds a research fellowship in the Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics at UNED. He was previously an assistant lecturer at San Antonio Catholic University, based in Murcia, Spain. He is a member of the TISAAL research group as well as several international associations such as the British Association for Applied Linguistics and DiscourseNet: International Association for Discourse Studies. His research interests include discourse and society, language contact, and national identity construction, bilingual education and bilingual language policy. He has an increasing number of publications, including a monograph, an edited volume (as a co-editor) and several articles.
- A.U. Constitutive Act, Art. 4, Para. B. https://au.int/sites/default/files/pages/34873-file-constitutiveact_en.pdf [accessed on 20/07/2021]
- Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism (revised edition). London, New York: Verso
- Anyefru, E. (2010). Paradoxes of the internationalisation of the Anglophone problem in Cameroon. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 28(1), 85-101. doi.org/10.1080/02589000903542624
- Chan Chi, K. (2014). China as ‘Other’: Resistance to and ambivalence toward national identity in Hong Kong. China Perspectives 1, 25-34. doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.6374
- Costelloe, L. (2014). Discourses of sameness: Expressions of nationalism in newspaper discourse on French urban violence in 2005. Discourse and Society, 25(3), 315-340. doi.org/10.1177/0957926513519533
- De Cillia, R., Wodak, R. & Reisigl, M. (1999). The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse and Society, 10(2), 149-173. doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002
- Echitchi, R. (2017). “Catalunya no és Espanya”: A critical discourse analysis of Artur Mas’s selected speeches”. Odisea, 18, 7-22. dx.doi.org/10.25115/odisea.v0i18.1895
- Fochingong, C. (2005). Exploring the politics of identity and ethnicity in state reconstruction in Cameroon. Social Identities, 11(4), 363-380. doi.org/10.1080/13504630500356355
- Gavrilos, D. (2010). Becoming ‘100% American’: negotiating ethnic identities through nativist discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 7(2), 95-112. doi.org/10.1080/17405901003675398
- Hall, S. (1996). The question of cultural identity”. S. Hall, D. Held, D. Hubert & K. Thompson (eds.) Modernity. An introduction to Modern Societies (pp 274-314). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Hobsbawn, E. & Ranger, T. (1983). The Invention of Tradition. Cambrige, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Howarth, D. (2000). Discourse. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
- Huang Hoon, C. (2004). Celebrating Singapore's development: An analysis of the millennium stamps. In L. Young, & C. Harrison (eds.) Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis: Studies in Social Change (pp. 140-155). London: Continuum Press.
- Jensen, K. V. (2008). Afrikaner Identities in Contemporary South Africa. Master´s Dissertation. Aalborg University.
- Kam Kah, H. (2012). The Anglophone problem in Cameroon: the North West/South West dichotomy from 1961-1996. CJDHR, 6(1), 71-103.
- Karner, C. (2005). The ‘Habsburg Dilemma’ today: competing discourses of national identity in contemporary Austria. National Identities, 7(4), 409-432. doi.org/10.1080/14608940500334382
- Konings, P. & Nyamnjoh, F. (1997). The Anglophone Problem in Cameroon. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 35(2), 207-229.
- Mummery, J. & Rodan, D. (2007). Discursive Australia: Refugees, Australianness, and the Australian Public Sphere. Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 21(3), 347-360. doi.org/10.1080/10304310701460672
- Ngoh, V. (1999). The origins of the marginalisation of former Southern Cameroonians 1961-1966: A historical analysis. Journal of Third World Studies, XVI(1), 165-183.
- Olick, J., Vinitzky-Seroussi, V. & Levy, D. (2011). The Collective Memory Reader. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Phillips, L. & Jorgensen, M. W. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: SAGE Publications.
- Rosie, M., Petersoo, P., MacInness, P., Condor, S., Kennedy, J. (2006). Mediating which nation? Citizenship and national identities in the British press. Social Semiotics 16(2), 327-344. doi.org/10.1080/10350330600664896
- U.N. Charter chap. XV1, Art. 102. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/chapter-16 [accessed on 20/07/2021]
- Van Dijk, T. (1997). What is political discourse analysis?. In J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (eds.) Political Linguistics (pp 11-52). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 11-52
- Verwey, C. & Quayle, M., 2012. Whiteness, racism, and Afrikaner identity in post-apartheid South Africa. African Affairs, 111(445), 551-575. doi.org/10.1093/afraf/ads056
- Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M. (2009). The Discursive Construction of National Identity (second edition). Edinburgh: University Press Edinburgh.
- Zhu, C. (2015). “Discourses and Scottish nationalist movement”. Canadian Social Science, 11(3), 63-69. dx.doi.org/10.3968/%25x